These amendments brought the enforcement of the Fair Housing Act even more squarely under the control of the U.S. In 1988, Congress passed the Fair Housing Amendments Act, which expanded the law to prohibit discrimination in housing based on disability or on family status (pregnant women or the presence of children under 18). This trend led to the growth in urban America of ghettoes, or inner city communities with high minority populations that were plagued by unemployment, crime and other social ills. During this same time period, white Americans steadily moved out of the cities into the suburbs, taking many of the employment opportunities Black people needed into communities where they were not welcome to live. Johnson argued that the bill would be a fitting testament to the man and his legacy, and he wanted it passed prior to King’s funeral in Atlanta.Īfter a strictly limited debate, the House passed the Fair Housing Act on April 10, and President Johnson signed it into law the following day.ĭid you know? A major force behind passage of the Fair Housing Act of 1968 was the NAACP’s Washington director, Clarence Mitchell Jr., who proved so effective in pushing through legislation aiding Black people that he was referred to as the “101st senator.” Impact of the Fair Housing Actĭespite the historic nature of the Fair Housing Act, and its stature as the last major act of legislation of the civil rights movement, in practice housing remained segregated in many areas of the United States in the years that followed.įrom 1950 to 1980, the total Black population in America’s urban centers increased from 6.1 million to 15.3 million. Since the summer of 1966, when King had participated in marches in Chicago calling for open housing in that city, he had been associated with the fight for fair housing. Johnson increased pressure on Congress to pass the new civil rights legislation. Amid a wave of emotion-including riots, burning and looting in more than 100 cities around the country-President Lyndon B. was assassinated in Memphis, Tennessee, where he had gone to aid striking sanitation workers. On April 4-the day of the Senate vote-the civil rights leader Martin Luther King, Jr. It then went to the House of Representatives, from which it was expected to emerge significantly weakened the House had grown increasingly conservative as a result of urban unrest and the increasing strength and militancy of the Black Power movement. In early April 1968, the bill passed the Senate, albeit by an exceedingly slim margin, thanks to the support of the Senate Republican leader, Everett Dirksen, which defeated a southern filibuster. Senate debate over the proposed legislation, Senator Edward Brooke of Massachusetts-the first African American ever to be elected to the Senate by popular vote-spoke personally of his return from World War II and his inability to provide a home of his choice for his new family because of his race. It prohibited discrimination concerning the sale, rental and financing of housing based on race, religion, national origin and sex. Title VIII of the proposed Civil Rights Act was known as the Fair Housing Act, a term often used as a shorthand description for the entire bill. The bill’s original goal was to extend federal protection to civil rights workers, but it was eventually expanded to address racial discrimination in housing. The proposed civil rights legislation of 1968 expanded on and was intended as a follow-up to the historic Civil Rights Act of 1964. Forum and the National Committee Against Discrimination in Housing lobbied for new fair housing legislation to be passed. In this climate, organizations such as the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People ( NAACP), the G.I. READ MORE: How a New Deal Housing Program Enforced Segregation Meanwhile, while a growing number of African American and Hispanic members of the armed forces fought and died in the Vietnam War, on the home front their families had trouble renting or purchasing homes in certain residential areas because of their race or national origin. Those who challenged them often met with resistance, hostility and even violence. (1968), which outlawed the exclusion of African Americans or other minorities from certain sections of cities, race-based housing patterns were still in force by the late 1960s. Despite Supreme Court decisions such as Shelley v.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |